If the job listings on new developer Cloud Chamber’s website are to be believed,BioShock 4will see the series integrate far more RPG features than the previous games. A listing for the role of Systems Designer requested experience designing an “emergent sandbox world,” while one for the position of Senior Voice Designer sought applicants with experience creating branching dialogue systems for other games.
BioShockhas never held back with its philosophical and political commentary, soBioShock 4is unlikely to buck that trend. However, if the next game really does include branching dialogue and a more open, sandbox world as the Cloud Chamber job listings suggest, it could flip one key part of the franchise’s philosophy on its head.
RELATED:BioShock 4’s Reveal Has to Go Big
Free Will In BioShock
“A man chooses, a slave obeys.” WhenRapture’s founder Andrew Ryanspeaks this line in the firstBioShock, the player is left with no doubt as to which side of the fence they fall on. It’s a line spoken during the reveal that the player character has been under the influence of mind control throughout the game so far, activated by the infamous phrase “would you kindly.” This may be one of the most memorable timesBioShockaddresses the player’s free will, but it’s far from the only one.
BioShock 1’s commentary on free will isn’t as simple as its twist might imply. Jack, the first game’s protagonist, does have one major choice he can make throughout the story - saving or harvestingthe Little Sisters. Although this choice changes some details of the game’s ending, Jack’s overall lack of control over his life and actions is without a doubt. Jack was grown in a lab by Fontaine Futuristics, on his right wrist is a tattoo of three chain links. Even his one main choice in the game is contextualized within his unwilling role as a pawn in the battle between Ryan and Frank Fontaine that he doesn’t even know is taking place for most of the game.
Jack’s lack of self-determination goes under the radar up until the twist by taking advantage of the player’s own suspension of disbelief - their willingness to simply follow orders, not from Atlas, but from the game objectives themselves. The lack of choice players have in what is ostensibly an interactive medium becomes a key part ofBioShock’s story, and something the proposedBioShockmoviewould likely have struggled to emulate.
Free Will In BioShock Infinite
Booker DeWitt isn’t exactly a “slave” like Jack, butBioShock Infiniteexplores questions about his free will as well. “There’s always a lighthouse, there’s always a man, there’s always a city,” says Elizabeth when explaining the multiverse. Not only does this undermine any choice Booker might make in a single reality, but it also implies that he’s just another version of Jack.
ThroughoutInfinite, Booker’s choices are shown to have little impact. Whether or not Booker gives Elizabeth the bird or cage brooch has almost no effect on events, for example.Infiniteeven flirts with determinism, particularly whenthe Lutece twinsask Booker to call a coin toss, which it turns out has landed on heads dozens of times in a row. As with the first game,BioShock Infiniteisn’t willing to fully commit to the idea that Booker lacks free will. However, the existence of the multiverse is shown to render many of the choices Booker makes irrelevant in the broader scheme of things.
The multiverse makesBooker De Witt’s freedom even more complicated. In one sense, he makes every possible choice simultaneously. There are realities where he is baptized and becomes Zachary Comstock, and others where he is not. In some realities he is a Vox Populi leader taking part in a revolution against himself. With every choice being made in different realities, it could be argued that Booker doesn’t have the ability to make any choices at all, especially when the different realities begin to interact.
However the player interpretsBioShock 1andInfinite’s commentaries on free will, one thing is clear. Both games take a restriction of their medium - the player’s ultimate lack of true freedom despite the medium’s interactivity - and instead of accepting it as a limitation turn it into a commentary on choice.
RELATED:Every BioShock 4 Rumor and Leak So Far
Free Will In BioShock 4
IfBioShock 4has a more open worldand a branching dialogue system, players could be presented with choices all of the time in a way that completely departs from the series so far. It could be very interesting to see aBioShockgame which tackles the topic of free will just like the previous installments in the series, but which has to factor in the player having far more freedom of choice within the game’s mechanics.
PreviousBioShockgames have used the linear nature of their narratives to comment on their protagonist’s freedom, so aBioShockgame with a far less linear narrative could flip the series' perspective on its head. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean that it won’t arrive at the same conclusions. No matter how many choices the player is given inBioShock 4, they still won’t have real freedom. Those choices and their outcomes will still be set in advance byCloud Chamber, and even ifBioShock 4still gives the player more choices to make than previous games, those choices will still be limited.
BioShock 4could use this to deepen its exploration of free will. It could explore how, even when given hundreds of choices, the player still has no control over the context of their decisions, or their ultimate consequences. The first game played on the fact that players would not question the objectives the game was setting for them.BioShock 4could play on their belief that the more choices their character has, the freer they are. Whether or not the game will choose to subvert this expectation remains to be seen, butBioShock 4’s RPG turndoesn’t necessarily have to contradict the series' exploration of freedom so far. Instead, it could take it even further by giving players more choices, while still ultimately showing that they aren’t truly free.
